God shows no partiality and neither should the Christian!

Part 1 - Why we should stop showing favoritism with God's image bearers!

It all started when they began to show me partiality. I thought this was a movement to help Westerners overcome antiwhitism, not a ranking system for them. But I found Jesus is the answer to all of that.

Truly I understand that God shows no partiality, but in every nation anyone who fears him and does what is right is acceptable to him.

- Acts 10:34-35

A little bit of my back story:

I remember when I first caught wind of this demonization of whites promoted by the media back in 2015. I was very sickened to see this promoted, and even accepted, even by some of my own family members and friends. It caused a great deal of disappointment to me. The demonization of our history, culture, people, and promotion of white self-hate indoctrination was very prevalent in the media. I began to wonder: Where are the people who are standing up to this? Are there people who are actually speaking against this? They weren't on my friend's list on Facebook, that's for sure.

So, I began to search for and follow pages that presented Western culture, ideals, and history in a positive way. I wanted something that would be uplifting to our folk. I then ran into the Western Positive Sphere. In this sphere were various groups and individuals working to address this antiwhite dogma spread by the mainstream media. I was very happy to see that there were people who had the courage to challenge this ideology which is now being pushed on our kids in schools.

Western Positive Community Definition:

Any group, organization, or movement that advocates towards the cultural interests, concerns, and/or civil rights of Westernkind for their well-being. Any cultural website or group that shares positivity of culture, history, or influence of Europe and the West.

---

Dealing with prejudice in the Western Cultural Preservation movement.

So, what is my stance on Western culture preservation? I'm all for it as long as it excludes hatred against all others (including others who choose to do otherwise). Nothing wrong with preserving culture. However, there appears to be some Nordicist infiltrators within this movement. There are some real poisonous ideologies being spread within the Western Positive Sphere that need to be addressed! Let me explain further:

When I began to go down this rabbit hole even further, I also ran into people and groups that promoted partiality based on color by emphasizing recessive genetic traits rather than cultural influence and unity among the entire Western population! This brings dishonor to the others that don't fit into that box. How does it bring dishonor to them? Let's explain further.

One unintended consequence of the fixation on recessive genes is the perpetuation of biases against individuals with brunette features.

While blonde hair and blue eyes are often romanticized as idealized traits within certain circles, the exclusionary nature of this perspective can alienate a significant portion of the population. It's essential to recognize and challenge these biases in order to bring forth unity within the preservation movement.

When I first caught wind of this favoritism pushed in the Western Positive Community (and it's not all of them), the people who were put at the top were usually the people who were super pale, light eyed, light haired. Why? Because of this hyper focus on preserving recessive genes. Why are they only focused on lightness when Europeans have dark features, too? It was then I began to be faced with more hatred and prejudice, only it is now coming from a different group. All because I've got an abundance of Eumelanin in my hair? Really folks?? All the while, many will gaslight you if you dare speak up about it.

I've seen multiple posts putting down other white people who were born with dark features such as brown hair and/or brown eyes or black hair.

And is this empowering? Nope! It is quite the opposite.

((She has some non-"European" DNA.))

Yeah, Mr. Pious. We know you’re colorist and hate the fact that brunettes are also included on a European culture page. Hate away. The look is here to stay. #hatersgonnahate

Partial treatment based on hair color

This is an attempt, by some; to exclude brunettes from the category of "European" or "Western". And yet Westerners are the group of people that are most likely to have brown hair. Isn't it ironic?

The comment below Elon Musk's post on Twitter/X by @AhComfy demonstrates the show of partiality based on hair color. If you find that you refuse to serve others because you don't see their value, then you, my friend; are filled with pride. Because God values every human being.

If you find yourself looking down on someone simply because of their color, then you are filled with pride. Because the love of God sees the soul, not the outward appearance.

If you find yourself talking more about yourself than God, if it's all about you and your status with men and what you have done, instead of what God has done? And what God can do?

Partiallity mentality

Then you are in danger. The spirit of pride is dangerous because the Bible tells us:

Pride goes before destruction and a haughty spirit before a fall.

-Proverbs 16:18

Pride is a sure sign that destruction is around the corner. Know that you will be destroyed if you do not go before God to be delivered from that spirit.

Pride is to exalt or boast in one's self. That you believe that you should be put above others, that you are more "deserving than others", and that you deserve to be served. You are stripping God of the praise that is due to him and taking it for yourself.

Funny how they will try to justify their partiality by saying ((they are a global minority; therefore, they deserve special treatment)) and in turn treat them better than the others? We Brunettes are not as common as some would say. Brunettes are just as unique as the others and have the broadest variety of hair shades in the world.

Think about this: if Westerners of all hair colors are around 10% of the world population. how can they turn around and also tell us that we are 75% of the planet? 🤔 Do these Aryan apologists even think their talking points through? No, of course they don't! Instead, they would have us and everyone else believe that their world minority status based on color somehow makes them more deserving than others. I am so flabbergasted. Yet this form of prejudice and partial treatment is widely accepted here.

Men present redheads and blondes, exclusively; as the representation of Western genetic identity. Brunettes? Nope!

Europeans, like any other population, exhibit a wide range of genetic diversity. The notion of "recessive genes" oversimplifies this diversity, implying that certain traits are more valuable or authentic than others. In reality, they have a spectrum of features, including various skin tones, eye colors, and hair shades.

Nordicists deem blonde and red hair as "more European" than brunette hair colors.

Attempting to homogenize this diversity under the banner of recessive genes neglects the richness of European heritage.

The focus on recessive genes can contribute to the marginalization of individuals who do not fit the perceived ideal traits within the preservation movement.

This bias against certain features, particularly those associated with brunette hair and brown eyes, creates a divisive environment within the community. Instead of fostering unity, such biases can lead to exclusion and alienation, undermining the broader goals of cultural preservation.

Many go so far as to use 'possibly mixed ancestry' as a pretext to justify their show of partiality of them. This is dishonorable snake behavior!

Imagine being treated as 'less than' on the basis of your color. Is that not colorism?

This made me think.... how does this make people of other ethnic backgrounds feel? It made me really think. The darker hues are just as amazing as the lighter hues. And I'm not going to lie, some have even turned my head!

There is beauty in every color.

So, what can be done about this? My suggestion is to avoid people that do this.

My color doesn't mean anything. Neither does yours. And therefore, minority status based on color also means nothing!

Confidence is knowing that you are just as deserving as anyone else and that you are a unique human being! Every single human being is unique, regardless of color. I am not common. I am custom made! Because God only made one of me. And he only made one of you. We each have a unique set of eyes, fingerprints, and DNA strands. And we are not to be compared to anyone else.

Our value as individuals is not determined by what we have or don't have. And that revelation is power!

So, my next question is: Where are the people standing up to this?

Even prejudice against Christians was propagated by some of these thought leaders.

My critique: If the Western positive community is going to succeed in their goal of bringing whites out of self-hate indoctrination, it's time we stop showing partial treatment to Westmen and Westwomen based on color, and to also treat people of other ethnic backgrounds with the same love as we treat ourselves. Stop demonizing Christians and Christianity (for those who do). And again, it is not all of them. But we've got some bad apples we have to deal with!

---

Why partiality is harmful:

You wanna talk about meme pathogens? Let’s talk about partiality, that sneaky little gremlin that pretends to be “principled outrage” while running on a very selective battery pack. 🔋

This isn't to criticize Jason's position against antiwhite dogma. This is about favoritism. When you see them go full DEFCON 1 over people attacking blondes? Meanwhile, your genuine struggles are completely ignored by the entire community? Even after seeing the hate hurled against you? And the hurt that it caused you?

When you receive the unfavorable criticism from Nordicists who casually roll in, and no one, and I mean no one; says one thing about it? But you see this twitter post flash across your screen? Either people have their heads in the sand, or this is something that they are choosing to ignore. And favoritism? I'm not about that. So what's with this bogus treatment? They told me I was:

((“Mediocre.”))

((“Nothing special.”))

((“Generic.”))

((“97% of the planet.”))

((Generally not preferred.))

All over hair color. I was baffled!

Lies. Zap. Shoot it down. Move on. 🛒

The Nordicists strike again with their partiality treatment.

And where were the outrage alarms then? Where was the defense squad? Where was the righteous fury for Westerners with brunette features?

Apparently stuck in traffic on the hierarchy highway.

Now, I'm not sure if these Nordicist haters were from Jason's community or not, but there were a few people from his community that attacked me as well. Why? Because I started speaking against this! That’s when it hit me. This isn’t about opposing attacks. It’s about who gets defended. Same era, same platform, same so called “Western people,” but wildly different reactions depending on hair color. If that’s not favoritism, then my Walkman is still cutting edge tech.

Yeah. That double standard is not in my head. It’s real, it’s loud, and it’s got a neon sign blinking “SELECTIVE OUTRAGE.”

Apparently saying “Hey, stop trashing this” is now a character flaw. I’ve heard it all. ((“Your default isn’t unique.”)) ((“Brunettes are a dime a dozen.”)) ((“Generic.”)) And my personal favorite, the not-so-subtle implication that darker features are somehow ((“Middle Eastern,”)) which in those circles is code for inferior. Real classy. Very evolved. Golf clap. 👏

And this isn’t random internet chaos. This is baked into certain white-positive and Nordicist spaces where the unspoken rule is simple. If it’s light, it’s sacred. If it’s dark, it’s unimportant. Blonde hair gets framed like an endangered species. Brunette hair gets treated like office carpeting. Everyone walks on it, nobody defends it.

And we’ve seen this movie before. It’s the same old popularity contest with a new neon filter. The lunch table hierarchy. The beauty economy arcade cabinet where only certain avatars get extra lives. 🎮

Partiality is harmful because it teaches people that dignity is conditional. That empathy has a preferred aesthetic. That if you don’t fit the favored template, your rejection is invisible, or worse, justified.

It messes with your head. Rejection always does. You start wondering why your own people don’t show up for you. You laugh it off with sarcasm because crying in public comments sections is bad for the brand. So you crack jokes, cue the synth bass, and keep moving.

But let’s be honest. A system that only protects some while mocking others isn’t about justice. It’s about ranking. And ranking poisons community every single time.

If defending people depends on hair color, then the problem isn’t hate. It’s partiality wearing moral cologne.

And yeah, I’m tired of it. But I’m also old enough to laugh, shake my head, and refuse to play along. Because I didn’t sign up for a beauty leaderboard. I signed up for truth, dignity, and a faith that doesn’t need the favor of men.

---

Partiality hurts! (("F- your feelings!")) They say!

Yeah. This bad idea called partiality? It hits people like me square in the face, neon lights and all. And when I point it out, some folks respond with the emotional depth of an unplugged Atari and say, ((“F- your feelings!”)) Real tough. Very Mad Max. Very brave behind a keyboard.

Yes, it hurts. Deeply. Being told, directly or with a wink and a smirk, that the features God gave me make me ((“less special,”)) ((“too common,”)) or not worthy of the same defense as others in my own ethnic group is not nothing. That’s rejection with a policy label slapped on it. And when I say, “Hey, this actually hurts,” the comeback is basically, ((“Stop making yourself into a victim. Now sit down and shut up.”))

That phrase isn’t strength. It’s armor. Cheap plastic armor. It keeps them from having to admit that their version of “advocacy” is quietly wounding people who don’t fit the preferred aesthetic. Because if they actually listened, they might have to ask the forbidden question: “If we’re about unity and wellbeing, why are we fine with making our own sisters feel small?” Cue the synth record scratch. 🎶

Here’s the truth they don’t want to load into the system. Partiality always hurts someone. Always. It creates insiders and outsiders, even within the same group. It teaches people that their value is conditional, based on how closely they match the “ideal preset.” And when the casualties of that system speak up, empathy is suddenly unavailable. Because empathy would mean deleting the hierarchy, and nobody wants to lose their high score.

So instead I get, ((“F- your feelings.”)) Translation: ((“Your pain messes with the narrative. Please power down and fall in line.”))

But my feelings aren’t the problem. Partiality is. And I’m not weak for naming the damage. I’m just refusing to pretend the synth isn’t screeching.

Jesus never told the wounded, the rejected, or the overlooked to toughen up and stop feeling things. He didn’t hand out bootstraps. He saw, He listened, and He healed.

I don’t have to stuff my pain to prove I’m “tough enough” for a movement that claims to defend me while quietly devaluing me. I’m allowed to say, out loud and in neon letters:

“This partiality wounded me. It’s wrong. And I’m not staying silent just to keep the peace in a community that doesn’t even love me anyway.”

Because the One who loves me already lifted me higher than any aesthetic ladder ever could. My voice matters to Him. My healing matters to Him. And yes, every shiny brunette strand matters to Him.

It took me years to heal from this. Years. So no, I’m not being dramatic. I’m being honest. And in an age of fake unity and selective outrage, honesty is the most radical thing I can wear.

Turn up the synth. I’m still standing. 🎹✨

---

Addressing the pretexts

So, after catching wind of all of this bias, I've come to realize that I cannot expect these people to step up and give me what I need. Many people (not all) in the Western positive sphere are only interested in one thing: preserving recessive light features. So, I've come to realize that most people within these interest groups are not for me. And they aren't going to come to my rescue when things go wrong (my personal experience). They aren't the people who will stand in my defense when things like colorism are perpetuated against those of the darker hues, such as myself.

This is my personal experience: the demonstration that they will only stand in defense for those who are discriminated against due to their light features. This idea that only white people with lighter features can possibly be hated due to prejudice is plain dishonesty. This show of partiality will turn more people away from your movement than you know. You want to be against race-hate and colorism? Be against all forms of it. This one-sided partial treatment I have continued to receive has left a very bad taste in my mouth.

In light of this, who do we need to turn to for our cares?

In order to get what we need; we must first acknowledge that Christ is ALL we need. Not interest groups formulated by man that will undoubtedly fail.

He came to break down the middle wall of partition. My God will be the one to fight for me. He is my deliverer, my counselor, my redeemer, and the rock of my salvation! He is the one who overcame the world so we could overcome the world through him!

Let's also deal with some other forms of partiality, shall we.

In the "trad movement" women were only valued if they could bear children. If you didn't have any children, you didn't have a say on any subject. I was barren and couldn't have children. That was heart wrenching enough, but to have it thrown in your face? As if it is your fault? And be treated differently? This is another example of partiality I have experienced.

Favor based on economic status is very prevalent in our world. The more money you have, the more people will look up to you, want to be like you, want you to come sit at their table. This is not just in our culture, but in pretty much every culture around the world.

The first time someone wanted to comment on my appearance, my facial features, weight, hair color, and eyes, and my family situation, I was very distraught. Really, guys. REALLY?? Why should any of this matter??

I was the poor girl with the brunette hair, introverted, and didn't have very many followers on social media. I had underlying health conditions that caused weight gain, weight loss resistance, and infertility. I was singled out for having features others didn't consider as your traditional Eurocentric look.

And because I was perceived to have the "low value cards", who came to my defense when that happened? No one. This partial treatment is what set me off.

To find myself surrounded with people who would only value what I have to offer if I looked a certain way, are a certain ethnic background, age, weight, or even a certain hair color? How in the world did I end up here? This seemed very shallow to me. I have a lot more to offer than my self-image. It's time to start from scratch and find a new circle of friends at this point.

As TheSumOfAllColors sumed it up for me:

((Brunettes with brown eyes are beautiful, but they are not under the same kind of targeted attack as the more fair features, so I decided to pump them up a bit.))

This assumption comes from the idea that the only devil out there is prejudice against light features. Tell me that you haven't looked into other perspectives without telling me.

So let me get this straight. I ask a totally reasonable question like, “Why can’t you represent all of Western people, with all their history and struggles?” and suddenly I’m not asking a question anymore. I’m committing a thought crime. Sirens blare. Neon warning lights flash. And instead of an answer, I get hit with colorist bias like it’s an acceptable substitute for logic.

What an insult. Seriously. That shouldn’t be normal. That shouldn’t be brushed off as “just how it is.” And yet here we are, watching people who claim to care about heritage turn around and gatekeep it by hair shade like they’re running a beauty pageant in a mall food court circa 1986.

Because let’s rewind the VHS for a second. Imagine someone saying this to your kid. Imagine your child asking, “Hey, do I belong here too?” and being met with a sneer, a shrug, or some backhanded comment about how they’re “too common” to count. That’s not strength. That’s cruelty dressed up as ideology. And no amount of tough-guy posturing makes that okay.

If your framework can’t include your own people without ranking them, it’s broken. Full stop. Heritage isn’t a limited-edition action figure. History doesn’t belong to one aesthetic setting. And dignity isn’t something you earn by matching a preferred look.

I’m not asking for special treatment. I’m asking for basic decency. And if that request short-circuits the system, maybe the system needs to be rebooted. Preferably with the power off.

Dear Sum of All Colors,

If you leave your echo chambers you will see every group of people are being attacked by a particular group. It's not rocket science but I understand, it's easier to think the world goes around you and it's the evil society vs you, it's a simplistic explanation of life.

((Echo chambers? Whites are the only ones who have actually been outside an echo chamber. We've been conditioned by the state and the MSM for decades to believe hateful lies about ourselves. We saw that side. And we realized it was lies, BS and anti-White superstition.))

-The Faminist

Almost everyone knows, if they've been paying attention, that the media is only there to sell us what they want us to believe. However, you guys are buying into this idea that the world is about whites vs non-whites... light features vs dark features... That is a very dangerous way of seeing the world. That's the mindset that led to Nazism. Can't you see there is a broader way to view the world than through the lens of color and ethnos? Can't you look beyond that frame of reference, for one moment, to see the bigger world? Outside the internet, people don't care about your skin or ethnic identity!

Thanx mainstream media. You've done an amazing job at dividing us, even by hair color. How much more are people going to fall for this divide and conquer strategy before they begin to wake up and realize they've been diabolically manipulated?

---

Closing Transmission: Power Down the Ranking System

Let’s land this plane.

When everything gets filtered through us vs them, light vs dark, rare vs common, preferred vs default, you don’t end up with clarity. You end up with a funhouse mirror version of reality where everyone’s paranoid, defensive, and convinced they’re the last ones who “see the truth.” 🎮🌐

That’s not awakening. That’s just swapping one echo chamber for another with a different wallpaper.

Yes, the media manipulates. That’s not breaking news; that’s been obvious since MTV stopped playing music videos. But when the response to manipulation is building new hierarchies and baptizing favoritism as “preference,” congratulations, you’ve walked straight into the sequel of the same bad movie.

Scripture doesn’t stutter on this:

God shows no partiality.

Not for race.

Not for features.

Not for tribes.

Not even for the ones who think they’ve figured it all out.

Partiality is sin because it fractures human dignity, turns neighbors into rivals, and replaces love with scorekeeping.

And history has already shown us where that road goes. Spoiler alert: it never ends well, no matter how noble it sounds at first.

Outside the internet, most people aren’t running spreadsheets on melanin, eye color, or ancestry percentages. They’re raising kids, paying bills, trying to survive, and hoping to be treated like human beings. Funny how that works.

So maybe the real rebellion isn’t picking a better tribe. Maybe it’s refusing to let any tribe tell you who gets to matter more.

And that’s where things got… interesting. Because when I went back to Scripture and quoted what Jesus and the apostles actually said about how Christians are supposed to treat their neighbors, I didn’t get applause. I got labeled antiwhite. Yes. For quoting the Bible. That story’s coming next.

Stay tuned for Part 2: “Called Antiwhite for Quoting Jesus? Yeah. That Actually Happened.” 🌌📼

---

Do you like... 🦄 All things Retro? 🌈 Judeo-Christian culture? 🎮 Game Development? 🎶 Electronic Music creation? 🏰 English Victorian?

If so, I hope you know you’ve got a mutual here! So be sure to sign up for the newsletter at the bottom of the page! Don't miss a thing.